WebDisinguishing condiions: A more modern reformulaion was undertaken by the Court of Appeal in BS & N Ltd v Micado Shipping Ltd (The Sealower) [2000] EWCA Civ 296 CA endorsed four key categories whereby a term is likely to be seen as a condiion (someimes called the ‘Waller test’): 1. If it is expressly so provided by statute 2. WebDetails B S & N Ltd v Micado Shipping Ltd (The “Seaflower”) - Court of Appeal (Waller, Rix and Jonathan Parker LJJ) - 22 November 2000 Tanker time-charter containing major oil company approvals clause - Shipowners agreeing to obtain Exxon approval within 60 days - Whether clause was a condition or an innominate term
BS & N Ltd v Micado Shipping Ltd (The ‘Seaflower’) [2001]
WebMay 31, 2024 · Citations: [2000] EWCA Civ 296 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha; ‘the Golden … WebNov 22, 2000 · Micado Shipping Limited (Malta) Respondent/Defendant Mr Timothy Hill (instructed by Shaw and Croft) for the Appellant. Mr David Joseph (instructed by Norton Rose) for the Respondent. Lord Justice Waller 1 This is an appeal from a decision of Aikens J given on 2 July 1999. crestline police scanner
9780717137039: Contract Cases and Materials - AbeBooks: …
WebDetails B.S. & N. LTD. (BVI) v. MICADO SHIPPING LTD. (MALTA) (THE “SEAFLOWER”) [2001] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 341 COURT OF APPEAL Before Lord Justice Waller, Lord Justice Rix and Lord Justice Jonathan Parker WebBsn ltd bvi v micado shipping ltd malta the seaflower. This preview shows page 56 - 58 out of 93 pages. BS&N Ltd (BVI) v Micado Shipping Ltd (Malta)(The “Seaflower”(No.1)) [2001] … WebJan 2, 2024 · BS & N Ltd (BVI) v Micado Shipping Ltd (Malta) (The ‘Seaflower’)[2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep 37 at 44 per Timothy Walker J: ‘This hand to mouth approach is further demonstrated by what actually happened…I reject any suggestion that this only happened because the charter had by then been terminated’ (emphasis added). crestline promo items